Raum und Entwerfen

Anrufen Website

Raum und Entwerfen Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Fakultät für Architektur
EKUT
Fachgebiet Raum und Entwerfen
Prof. Marc Frohn (Fachgebietsleiter)

Master studio - THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON - KarlsruheSS26 From the atelier system of the Académie des Beaux-Arts to the B...
18/10/2026

Master studio - THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON - Karlsruhe
SS26
 
From the atelier system of the Académie des Beaux-Arts to the Bauhaus and its total vision of art and craft to the pedagogical experiments after 1968, architectural schools have continually redefined themselves. Once hierarchical and authority-driven, they gradually opened to contexts shaped by sociology, politics, economy, and ecology. Transmission became exchange. The master’s desk turned into a shared table.

The spatial organization of a school is never neutral. It produces knowledge, frames positions, and structures encounters. Studios, seminar rooms, and libraries are not mere containers; they stage debate and collaboration. Pedagogy and space inform one another.
 
As our current buildings face major renovation, the high-rise and pavilion long occupied by the school of physics will soon become available. Moving the architecture school there would be more than a change of address. It would mean a radical shift in the spatial framework of our education and research.
 
Our present buildings, raised on a plinth, are introverted and courtyard-centered—generous yet rigid, almost invisible on campus. The former physics cluster operates as a counterpoint: an open pavilion engaging its surroundings and a tower whose skeletal structure promises adaptable floor plates.
 
Pavilion and tower create a productive tension. One spreads and mediates; the other compacts and focuses. Together they redefine proximity, exposure, and circulation, suggesting new modes of encounter and collaboration. Does this tension produce a framework for our school? From introverted to extroverted, hidden to visible, rigid to adaptable: a shift in spatial logic—and in architectural education.
 

Students:
Hausner Sophia
Ishizuka Yutaro
Kergoat Ivane
Kruszek Piotr Jan
Peter Niklas
Sanhueza Cristobal
Stamp Friedrich
Tooyserkani Maryam
Zhou Zimeng

External Jury Members
Manuel Leon Fanjul (Hermitage)

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLONSummersemester 26Sophia Hausner
18/10/2026

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON
Summersemester 26

Sophia Hausner

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLONSummersemester 26Niklas Peter
18/10/2026

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON
Summersemester 26

Niklas Peter

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLONSummersemester 26Yutaro Ishizuka
18/10/2026

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON
Summersemester 26

Yutaro Ishizuka

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLONSummersemester 26Maryam Tooyserkani
18/10/2026

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON
Summersemester 26

Maryam Tooyserkani

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLONSummersemester 26Zimeng Zhou
18/10/2026

Master Studio THE TOWER & THE PAVILLON
Summersemester 26

Zimeng Zhou

StudioSommersemester 2026„Blue Banana“Charline Fuchs
12/08/2026

Studio
Sommersemester 2026
„Blue Banana“

Charline Fuchs

StudioSommersemester 2026„Blue Banana“Emil Leyens
12/08/2026

Studio
Sommersemester 2026
„Blue Banana“

Emil Leyens

StudioSommersemester 2026„Blue Banana“Florin Stöffler
12/08/2026

Studio
Sommersemester 2026
„Blue Banana“

Florin Stöffler

Studio Back to Future?Wintersemester 25Flexibility, participation, spatial freedom, long-term adaptability - these are t...
23/04/2026

Studio Back to Future?
Wintersemester 25

Flexibility, participation, spatial freedom, long-term adaptability - these are today´s architectural buzz-words. Looking back into architectural history, we realize it was the very same set of promises that drove the discipline half a century ago. Looking back fifty years - from the then imagined self-determined and flexible future – it is our conviction that we cannot just repeat the same mantras. Instead, we need to be aware of the broken promises and understand their inherent contradictions. Our studio focuses on exactly this déjà-vu.

Few architects embodied the above-mentioned ideals as rigorously as Hermann Hertzberger.
His Centraal Beheer project - modular, open, democratic - was imagined as a proto-city, a collective framework for freedom and adaptability. Yet its spatial reality reveals deep paradoxes.

A building designed as a city turns inward and is disconnected from its context; a flexible grid becomes disorienting and rigid. Structural coherence undermines spatial legibility by its users. The non-hierarchical plan, meant to empower, introduces forms of control. The building has been sitting empty for twelve years.
Today, half a century after its realization, the project stands as both promise and paradox.

Our studio neither sought to restore nor to preserve Hertzberger’s project.
Instead, in a first step, the students carefully analysed it. Based on their in-depth understanding, they reformulated its original promises and developed programmatic and architectural strategies for its renewed occupation.

Students:
Christina Albrecht
Ahmad Harre
Dima Abuzaid
Anna G***k
Greta Feldmann
Jimena Chauca
Johannes Doering
Tobias Joksch
Philipp Müller
Mark Neubauer
Christina Giers
Sophia Von Olnhausen
Pia Trenn
Tzu Wei Chang
Xinyue Yu

External Jury Members:
Herman Hertzberger
Laurens Jan ten Kate (HHA)
Marjolein Kuipers (Apeldoorn City Council)

Adresse

Englerstraße 7, Geb. 20. 40, Raum 217
Karlsruhe
76131

Öffnungszeiten

Montag 09:00 - 12:00
Dienstag 09:00 - 12:00
Mittwoch 09:00 - 12:00
Donnerstag 09:00 - 12:00
Freitag 09:00 - 12:00

Telefon

+4972160842173

Benachrichtigungen

Erfahren Sie als Erste/r von Neuigkeiten und Aktionen: Wir schicken Ihnen eine E-Mail, wenn Raum und Entwerfen etwas veröffentlicht. Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird für keinen anderen Zweck verwendet, und Sie können sich jederzeit abmelden.

Verknüpfungen

Teilen