02/07/2026
Last week Pirjo and Emanuele took part in the international conference on "Postdigital Backlash: Past, Present, Future conference" in Zagreb (Croatia).
In our research and teaching, the term "postdigital" has acquired more and more centrality. It is a useful term to better understand the present but also to see where we are heading to as society.
Pirjo wrote something that is worth sharing here as well.
Commenting on the general topic of the conference that revolved around backlash, Pirjo clarifies what postdigital may help us realise:
"there is no meaningful "back" in backlash. There is no return to a pre-digital classroom waiting for us. Digital technologies are already woven into how we teach, learn and live. So perhaps, indeed, it’s not backlash at all, but forwardlash."
Being postdigital urges us to look forward and "find new ways of living with technologies critically, creatively and on our own terms."
In her presentation, Pirjo explored the idea of a quiet backlash - "the everyday mundane ways people subtly rework anticipations that come with technologies rather than simply accepting or rejecting them."
Being postdigital means that the promises of digital technologies are not simply taken for granted, but tinkered with.
And in relation to AI, Pirjo writes that it "has become an oddly convenient shorthand for anxieties that long predate AI itself. We often seem to focus on technology as the problem but many of the debates we're having are really about something else. They are about what we value in education, what we recognise as learning, what we consider fair and even what we imagine a "proper" human to be." Pirjo Mõttus