25/08/2026
What actually counts as “natural behaviour”?
This recent paper caught my attention because it asks a deceptively simple question:
What IS natural behaviour?
We often hear that animals should be allowed to “behave naturally”.
But a paper published at the end of July argues that for adaptable species living across many different environments, defining one single natural behaviour or environment isn’t necessarily straightforward.
Instead, the author argues for looking carefully at measurable behavioural outcomes and how animals successfully adapt to their environment.
It’s an interesting welfare question.
As a behaviourist, I think context is incredibly important.
Rather than asking only:
“Is this natural?”
we can also ask:
“What does this individual animal need to experience good welfare in the environment they’re actually living in?”
What do you think?
What is a natural behavior? I argue that the study of natural behaviors is often the study of the spontaneous behaviors of animals placed in quantifiably different environments. For behavioral generalists such as rodents, humans, and many other species, there may be no such definable construct as a....