Prof. Naveen Kumar

Prof. Naveen Kumar Presently working as Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering since 1996; Prof. Kumar possesses 27 years of experience.

Professor Naveen Kumar is actively involved in teaching and research at Delhi Technological University (Formerly Delhi College of Engineering) for the past 22 years.

As I have promised, I am bringing the sixth episode of my nine-episode satire series that begins the OTT style saga: “Th...
10/03/2026

As I have promised, I am bringing the sixth episode of my nine-episode satire series that begins the OTT style saga: “The Vice Chancellor Who Could Never Be Professor”—nine episodes, each peeling back another layer of absurdity from a university that redefined excellence as outsourcing and governance as WhatsApp administration.

Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended. This is the work of fiction.

🎬 Episode 6: “The Self-Obsessed VC: And the Postpone University”

The Vice Chancellor of Lotus University was a man who, in truth, had never been considered fit even for a junior faculty post at the Lotus University. He had a résumé so light it could be mistaken for a visiting card. But thanks to the clout of an immediate family member, he parachuted into the VC’s chair at Lotus University. Yet, seated on the throne of borrowed power, he behaved as if he could silence anyone with a snap of his fingers.

At his last private institution, mutiny was routine — his authority challenged more often than the cafeteria’s hygiene. That insecurity blossomed into vanity when he arrived at Lotus University. Within weeks, he proclaimed: “Every board, banner, and flyer must carry my photo.”

Quantum physics seminars, ethics workshops, even lost and found notices for slippers bore his face. Posters of him smiling, smirking, squinting, and looking vaguely confused plastered every wall. Students joked that “Fire Exit” signs and even the “Toilet Closed” signs would soon feature his portrait . The campus became a gallery of his expressions, but nowhere did his name appear where it mattered — in research journals or academic citations. Students whispered that Lotus University had become a “billboard university,” scholarship eclipsed by his selfies.

Drunk on arrogance, he picked fights with multiple upright faculty members — scholars who refused to bow to his unlawful oral diktats. Among them stood a true sage: an internationally acclaimed scientist, the very architect who had built Lotus University from scratch with untiring effort. The VC mistook dignity for weakness. He thought: “I am the god of this university. Who can challenge me?”
The VC launched his attacks with oral orders, petty memos, fact finding committees while sycophantic courtiers clapping in the background. He expected submission. But arrogance blinded him. He failed to see that provoking scholars of such stature was like a reckless power emboldened by its allies, poking a rival it thought was weak — only to discover that the rival was backed by deeper strength, alliances, and moral authority.

This was not just a campus quarrel. It mirrored the kind of provocation and entanglement the world is witnessing today — where arrogance leads to miscalculation, and miscalculation leads to traps from which escape is nearly impossible.

The faculty sage did not shout. He did not retaliate with noise. Instead, he responded with dignity and precision. He documented every violation, invoked statutes, filed RTIs, and unearthed audit trails. He wielded the power of truth, backed by institutional memory and international credibility.

His calmness echoed the Gita’s wisdom: “समत्वं योग उच्यते” (His calmness echoed the Gita’s wisdom: Equanimity itself is yoga-सुख-दुःख, सफलता-विफलता, और अनुकूल-प्रतिकूल परिस्थितियों में मन की समता (संतुलन) बनाए रखना ही योग है)

And his resolve carried the force of:
“कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन ।
मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूर्मा ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणि ॥”
— Your right is to action alone, never to its fruits. Do not let the fruits of action be your motive, nor let your attachment be to inaction (आपका अधिकार केवल कर्म करने में है, उसके फल (परिणाम) में कभी नहीं। इसलिए, न तो फल की इच्छा से कर्म करें और न ही कर्म न करने (निष्क्रियता) में आसक्त हों)
He acted with duty, not desire for revenge, knowing that truth itself would deliver the outcome.

The illusion of authority that the VC carried began to collapse. His oral diktats, once feared, were now dissected in inquiries; his foreign tour expenses, once hidden, were dragged into the light; his garlanded mediocrity, once celebrated, was ridiculed. The faculty sage’s calm documentation, combined with the defiance of upright professors, stripped away the mask, and the campus saw the VC for what he truly was — a man unworthy of even a lecturer’s chair, propelled upward by family privilege, now masquerading as the university’s deity.

Worse still, his inefficiency and short‑sightedness had paralyzed campus life. All major academic, cultural, and sports events were postponed one after another, each time with a flimsy excuse. Students, frustrated and disillusioned, gave the university a new nickname: “Postpone University.” The courtiers who once clapped fell silent, the students whispered openly, and the wider academic community recognized the hollowness of his reign. The provocation had backfired spectacularly: just as the world today witnesses arrogant powers trapped by their own miscalculations, Lotus University now witnessed its VC ensnared by the very system he thought he could silence. His reality was no longer hidden; it was known to everyone.

And in the silence that followed, the Gita’s timeless words echoed across the campus:
"सत्यमेव जयते, धर्मस्य विजयते" अर्थ: सत्य की ही जीत होती है, धर्म की ही विजय होती है।

As I have promised, I am bringing the fifth episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga:  “T...
03/03/2026

As I have promised, I am bringing the fifth episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga: “The Vice Chancellor Who Could Never Be Professor”—nine episodes , each peeling back another layer of absurdity from a university that redefined excellence as outsourcing and governance as WhatsApp administration.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended. This is the work of fiction.

🎬 Episode 5: Oral Orders, the God of the University, and the Five Kauravas

The Vice Chancellor of Lotous University, having already paraded humanoid robots, now revealed his most chaotic doctrine: “Procedure is irrelevant. Do what I say. I am the god of the university.” Governance was reduced to whispers in corridors, casual remarks over tea, and decrees in elevators. Faculty were left in confusion, unsure whether these oral orders were binding or merely passing moods. Worse still, on multiple occasions the VC disowned his own words, leaving departments stranded mid‑implementation, projects stalled, and accountability dissolved into thin air.

This disorder was rooted in his past — a donkey job in the private sector where shortcuts were sacred and compliance optional. Transplanted into a public university, he carried those habits like divine commandments, confusing directives with suggestions, ignoring mandatory procedures, and dismissing statutory requirements as bureaucratic hurdles. His ignorance of government norms became the daily syllabus for faculty, who studied his mistakes more than their own subjects.

Adding to the chaos was his official tour to the USA, funded by the public exchequer. While it was supposed to be about academic networking, the VC refused to disclose the expenditure details. Queries about costs were brushed aside with vague phrases like “strategic exposure to excellence.” Whispers spread across campus that his itinerary may have included a detour to a mysterious island retreat that had been in the news for all the wrong reasons. The secrecy only deepened mistrust, and the tour was seen less as an academic mission and more as a luxury junket with suspicious shadows.

In the Mahabharata, the five Pandavas stood for truth, wisdom, justice, humility, and foresight. Yudhishthira embodied dharma, Bhima loyalty and strength, Arjuna wisdom and discipline, Nakula humility and service, and Sahadeva foresight and honesty. But in Lotous University, their opposites emerged — the five Kauravas of mediocrity. Kaurava One was the VC himself, issuing oral decrees, disowning them later, and proclaiming divinity over procedure. Kaurava Two manipulated teaching loads to justify ornamental appointments. Kaurava Three guarded silence over broken internet, ensuring failures were never reported. Kaurava Four distributed garlands of mediocrity, crowning incompetence as excellence. Kaurava Five acted as treasurer of secrecy, shielding USA tour expenses and whispering about island retreats.

Orbiting them were two dignified yet satirical satellites: Courtier One, a faculty opportunist who echoed the VC’s words in meetings for petty perks, and Courtier Two, another hanger‑on who clapped louder than anyone else, trading integrity for crumbs of privilege. Together, they formed the VC’s inner circle — a parody of the Pandavas, but dedicated to dismantling truth and wisdom.

While students struggled with broken internet and faculty wrestled with pseudo‑loads, the VC continued to issue oral decrees with the confidence of a monarch. He declared: “My word is policy. I am the god of this university.” And the five Kauravas, flanked by Courtier One and Courtier Two, clapped once again, praising his vision and urging him to patent oral policy.

The episode climaxed with the inauguration of the Oral Excellence Drive — no files, no records, just spoken commands. A marble plaque was unveiled beside a pile of burning documents labeled “Procedures.” It read: “Vision is not what you document, but what you declare.” Students watched in disbelief. They saw governance reduced to whispers, rules replaced by ego, and accountability buried under oral decrees.

But little did the VC realize — the government had taken note. His oral diktats, his disregard for norms, and his misuse of public funds had triggered quiet scrutiny. The very procedures he burned were now being reviewed by those who mattered. Whispers turned into reports. Reports turned into inquiries. And as the VC sat on his throne of delusion, the countdown had begun.

His days at Lotous University were numbered.

🎬 एपिसोड 5: मौखिक आदेश, विश्वविद्यालय का भगवान और पाँच कौरव

लोटस विश्वविद्यालय के कुलपति, जो पहले ही ह्यूमनॉइड रोबोट का प्रदर्शन कर चुके थे, अब अपने सबसे अराजक सिद्धांत के साथ सामने आए:
"प्रक्रिया अप्रासंगिक है। जो मैं कहूं वही करो। मैं इस विश्वविद्यालय का भगवान हूँ।"

शासन अब गलियारों की फुसफुसाहटों, चाय के कप के साथ दिए गए निर्देशों और लिफ्ट में बोले गए आदेशों पर आधारित था। कोई लिखित परिपत्र नहीं, कोई दस्तावेज़ी नीति नहीं, कोई आधिकारिक अधिसूचना नहीं।
शिक्षक वर्ग भ्रमित था — "क्या यह आदेश है या बस एक क्षणिक मूड?"

लेकिन असली अराजकता तब आई जब कुलपति ने अपने ही मौखिक आदेशों से मुकरना शुरू कर दिया।
परियोजनाएँ ठप हो गईं, ज्ञापन गायब हो गए, और दोष दूसरों पर डाल दिया गया। जवाबदेही धुएँ में बदल गई।

निजी क्षेत्र की गधागिरी

कुलपति की सरकारी नियमों की अज्ञानता किंवदंती बन चुकी थी।
वह निर्देशों को सुझाव समझते थे, वित्त और नियुक्ति की अनिवार्य प्रक्रियाओं को नजरअंदाज करते थे, और वैधानिक आवश्यकताओं को "निरर्थक अड़चनें" कहते थे।

इसका मूल कारण था उनका पिछला अनुभव — एक निजी कंपनी में गधागिरी, जहाँ शॉर्टकट ही नीति थे।
अब एक सार्वजनिक विश्वविद्यालय में, वे उन्हीं आदतों को ईश्वरीय आदेश मानकर लागू कर रहे थे।

अमेरिका यात्रा और रहस्य

इस अराजकता में एक और अध्याय जुड़ा — कुलपति की अमेरिका यात्रा, जो सार्वजनिक धन से वित्तपोषित थी।
यह यात्रा अकादमिक नेटवर्किंग के नाम पर थी, लेकिन खर्च का कोई विवरण सार्वजनिक नहीं किया गया।
प्रश्न पूछे गए तो जवाब मिला: "यह उत्कृष्टता का रणनीतिक अवलोकन था।"

कैंपस में फुसफुसाहटें फैल गईं —
क्या कुलपति ने अपनी यात्रा में एक रहस्यमयी द्वीप का भी दौरा किया, जो हाल ही में गलत कारणों से खबरों में था?
क्या यह शोध था या विलासिता का आवरण?

महाभारत के पांडव बनाम लोटस विश्वविद्यालय के कौरव

महाभारत में पाँच पांडव सत्य, ज्ञान, न्याय, विनम्रता और दूरदृष्टि के प्रतीक थे।
लेकिन लोटस विश्वविद्यालय में उनके विपरीत उभरे पाँच कौरव —

- कौरव एक: स्वयं कुलपति — मौखिक आदेश देते, बाद में मुकर जाते, और खुद को भगवान घोषित करते।
- कौरव दो: शिक्षण भार में हेरफेर कर सजावटी नियुक्तियों को सही ठहराते।
- कौरव तीन: इंटरनेट की विफलता को छुपाते, ताकि कोई शिकायत न हो।
- कौरव चार: औसत दर्जे को उत्कृष्टता का ताज पहनाते।
- कौरव पाँच: अमेरिका यात्रा के खर्च को छुपाते और द्वीप की फुसफुसाहटों को हवा देते।

इनके साथ थे दो दरबारी —
- दरबारी एक: मीटिंग में कुलपति की बातों को दोहराते, सिर्फ छोटे लाभों के लिए।
- दरबारी दो: सबसे जोर से ताली बजाते, ईमानदारी को सुविधाओं के बदले बेचते।

यह मंडली पांडवों की व्यंग्यात्मक परछाई थी — सत्य और ज्ञान को नष्ट करने के लिए समर्पित।

व्यंग्य का चरम

जब छात्र इंटरनेट की विफलता से जूझ रहे थे और शिक्षक झूठे कार्यभार से परेशान थे, कुलपति ने घोषणा की:
"मेरी बात ही नीति है। मैं इस विश्वविद्यालय का भगवान हूँ।"

पाँच कौरव और दोनों दरबारी फिर ताली बजाने लगे:
"सर, यह दूरदर्शिता है!"
"सर, आप मौखिक नीति का पेटेंट करवा लें!"

अंतिम दृश्य

कुलपति ने एक नई पहल शुरू की:
"मौखिक उत्कृष्टता अभियान" — कोई फाइल नहीं, कोई रिकॉर्ड नहीं, सिर्फ बोले गए आदेश।

एक संगमरमर की पट्टिका का अनावरण हुआ, जिसके पास "प्रक्रियाएँ" नामक दस्तावेज़ जल रहे थे।
पट्टिका पर लिखा था:
"दृष्टि वह नहीं जो आप दस्तावेज़ करें, बल्कि वह जो आप घोषित करें।"

छात्रों ने देखा — शासन फुसफुसाहटों में बदल गया, नियम अहंकार से दब गए, और जवाबदेही मौखिक आदेशों के नीचे दफन हो गई।

लेकिन कहानी यहीं खत्म नहीं हुई...

कुलपति को यह अहसास नहीं था कि सरकार ने उनके गैरकानूनी आदेशों और स्थापित नियमों की अवहेलना पर संज्ञान ले लिया है।
उनकी मौखिक तानाशाही, नियमों की अनदेखी और सार्वजनिक धन के दुरुपयोग की जांच शुरू हो चुकी थी।
जिन प्रक्रियाओं को उन्होंने जलाया था, अब वही उनके खिलाफ दस्तावेज़ बन रही थीं।

लोटस विश्वविद्यालय में उनके दिन अब गिने-चुने रह गए थे l

As I have promised, I am bringing the fourth episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga:  “...
25/02/2026

As I have promised, I am bringing the fourth episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga: “The Vice Chancellor Who Could Never Be Professor”—nine episodes , each peeling back another layer of absurdity from a university that redefined excellence as outsourcing and governance as WhatsApp administration.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended. This is the work of fiction.

🎬 Episode 4: The Festival of Mediocrity (with Humanoid Innovation)

After leasing land and ruining university own labs, and redefining “excellence” as emojis, the Vice Chancellor of Lotous University staged his grandest spectacle yet: a carnival of mediocrity disguised as innovation.

During this time, new faculty recruitment was carried out by the VC for obvious personal reasons — not academic need.

- No calculation of actual teaching load was ever done within the university
- Departments were forced to show inflated “pseudo‑loads” to justify appointments.
- Student funds were siphoned off to pay salaries for these ornamental recruits.

He then came up with a brilliant idea of recruiting Emeritus professor, visiting faculty, professor of practice and adjunt faculty to accomodate his own entourage.

The showpiece was a less than a mediocre teacher:
- He never engaged with classes in a career spanning more than 30 years, leaving lecture halls echoing with silence.
- He concocted a mad “model of excellence” that was neither academic nor practical.
- He openly ran side businesses, treating the university as a pension granting cow which he milked shamelessly.
- He appeared on campus only once or twice a month.

Yet, with garlands and fanfare, he was declared an Emeritus Professor. The title, meant to honor lifelong scholarship, was reduced to a souvenir of sycophancy.

Alongside him, others were paraded:
- A Professor of Practice whose only practice was praising the VC.
- A Visiting Faculty member who visited once, delivered a sycophantic lecture, and vanished taking hefty sum into his pocket.
- Retired figures rebranded as “thought leaders” for lending their names to the VC’s circus.

The result: classrooms remained under‑taught, while payrolls ballooned. Students paid the price, literally. Meanwhile, genuine scholars — those who built labs, mentored students, and published internationally — were sidelined, mocked, or punished.

Silence on Internet Failure
And while this charade unfolded, the university’s internet remained non‑functional despite a large sum of students funds was spent to run it seamlessly.
- Students struggled to access journals, submit assignments, or even check exam schedules.
- Faculty could not download research papers or communicate with collaborators.

Yet the VC remained silent. In speeches, he declared: “Lotous University is a beacon of excellence.”

The irony was glaring: a university without functioning internet, without basic amenities, yet branded as a lighthouse of innovation.

The Humanoid Spy
Inspired by an recently held international event where another university showcased a four‑legged robot (imported but paraded as their own), the VC announced his own “innovation”:
A two‑leg humanoid robot to spy on faculty. The human turned robos would visit classrooms, check if faculty were “engaging” students, and report back to the VC. These robos were equipped with cameras and the privacy of students particularly girls students and female faculty was balantly ignored by regularly taking still photos and recording videos and passing it to the vc for his sadistic pleasure. These robos could even smell the level of teaching by faculty and the understanding of the students.

The VC declared:
“This is disruptive pedagogy. Excellence will now be monitored by human turned machines.”
- Attendance registers would be replaced by robotic surveillance logs
- Faculty would be judged not on teaching quality, but on compliance with the robot’s sensors.

The Circus of Titles and Machines
While the dedicated faculty was disheartened due to this comedy circ, Sycophants clapped like trained seals:
“Sir, this is revolutionary.”
“Sir, you are redefining education.”
“Sir, you should patent this humanoid innovation.”

One even proposed naming the robot after the VC:
“VC‑Bot: The Guardian of Excellence.”

The Climax
The festival ended with the inauguration of a new block:
“VC Excellence Hall” — complete with a marble plaque bearing the VC’s name and the inscription:
“Vision is not what you achieve, but what others say you achieved.”

Students watched in disbelief. They saw mediocrity garlanded, sycophancy rewarded, human robots deployed for surveillance, and merit buried under hollow applause.

They whispered: “Is this a university — or a festival of mediocrity with humanoid spies?”

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is en...
25/02/2026

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended. This is the work of fiction.

Satire: The Vice Chancellor’s Backdoor Revolution

At the Imaginary University of Excellence, the Vice Chancellor has unveiled his grand vision: the Employee Ward Quota.

Merit? Outdated. Fairness? Overrated. The new motto is: “Why compete, when you can inherit?”

The Academic Council is solemnly assured that this is all about “employee welfare.” Yet everyone knows the truth: the first seat is for the Vice Chancellor’s own ward, the next for his close associate’s child, and the rest for anyone clever enough to secure a short‑term tenure. Professors of Practice and Emeritus Professors suddenly find themselves in demand — not for their scholarship, but for their ability to smuggle their wards through the back door.

And here’s the masterstroke: this quota comes with no government reservation at all. A neat little island of exclusivity, insulated from the framework of social justice. Equal opportunity is politely shown the door, while nepotism strolls in with a grin.

Entrance exams? Redundant. Hard work? Irrelevant. Government policy? Inconvenient. The Vice Chancellor has cracked the code: transform a university into a family estate, where admissions are decided not by talent but by surname.

Students whisper that a new course is on the horizon: B.Tech in Nepotism Engineering, with guaranteed placements — provided your parent has a corner office.

And so, the temple of learning risks becoming a parody of itself. The Vice Chancellor, however, remains triumphant. After all, he has achieved what few dare: turning higher education into a private club, where the only entrance exam is your family tree.

Today I am bringing the third episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga:  “The Vice Chance...
25/02/2026

Today I am bringing the third episode of my nine episode satire series that begins the OTT‑style saga: “The Vice Chancellor Who Could Never Be Professor”—nine episodes , each peeling back another layer of absurdity from a university that redefined excellence as outsourcing and governance as WhatsApp administration.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, place or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended. It is a work of fiction.

🎬 Episode 3: The Lease of Excellence

After emojis and WhatsApp decrees, the Vice Chancellor of Lotous University discovered a new frontier: land and loot disguised as reform.

He conspired with cronies to float Section‑8 companies, funneling public funds to the unworthy while starving genuine scholars. A dubious figure was crowned CEO of the so‑called “innovation initiative,” pocketing a king’s ransom for parroting the VC’s whims and posing as a visionary.

With fanfare, the VC announced: “Centres of Excellence.”
The phrase glittered like cheap tinsel. Students imagined labs, mentors, and innovation hubs. In reality, it was a leasing racket—a land grab dressed up as reform.

University plots meant for hostels, libraries, and laboratories were quietly handed to private parties. MoUs were signed with foreign universities without government approval. These “global collaborations” were nothing but photo‑ops. The VC used them as passports to foreign junkets, strutting abroad at student expense, while back home:
- The canteen was shuttered.
- Departments had no drinking water.
- Student facilities decayed into ruins.

Functional labs were dismantled. Valuable instruments were tossed into garbage bins. Their space was parceled out to outsiders. Excellence was not created—it was auctioned to the highest bidder of gratitude.

Professors asked:
“Where is the academic due diligence?”
“Who approved these land transfers?”
“Why is the university acting like a landlord?”

The VC’s answer was predictable: persecution.
He constituted multiple fact‑finding committees against a senior professor, burying the first report and demanding more until one suited his narrative. His governance was not policy—it was vendetta.

And while land was being leased, the VC was conspicuously absent from office.
His chair sat empty like a museum relic. He ruled entirely through his phone.
- Orders arrived as WhatsApp messages.
- Decisions as emojis.
- Governance as digital decrees.

Faculty and students who sought answers from his secretariat were met with evasions and scripted lies:
“Sir is busy in meetings.”
“Sir is traveling for collaborations.”

In truth, Sir was simply absent—physically invisible, digitally omnipresent, and institutionally irresponsible.

Unlike his predecessor who built the university brick by brick, he ignored basic amenities:
- The main canteen remained shut for over a year.
- Departments lacked drinking water.
- Student facilities rotted.

To add intellectual glitter to this real estate circus, the VC began organizing expert lectures. But the “experts” were individuals with dubious credentials, far below the calibre of Lotus University’s own professors.

One had never published a paper.
Another had failed basic qualifying exams.
Yet they were introduced as “visionaries,” “thought leaders,” and “global disruptors.”

Attendance was declared mandatory for all faculty.
Registers were placed at the hall entrance like a school roll call.

Those who missed—even for genuine reasons—were punished:
- A professor presenting a paper abroad was reprimanded for “non‑compliance.”
- Another, hospitalized for surgery, was accused of “academic indiscipline.”

The VC’s decree was clear: “Credentials don’t matter. Loyalty does. Excellence is whatever I say it is.”

Meanwhile, sycophants clapped like trained seals:
“Sir, this is transformative.”
“Sir, you are redefining academia.”
“Sir, you should be nominated for Padma Vibhushan.”

One even proposed naming the new block after the VC himself:
“The Centre for Excellence in Self‑Promotion.”

The VC grinned. In his donkey‑job past, he had neither the authority to appease anyone nor the respect of peers. Now he presided over acres of prime property—leased in the name of students, enjoyed in the name of self.

His own colleagues and superiors from the organization he parachuted from remembered him as a mediocre functionary who used family clout to grab this plum posting.

Students paid higher fees, walked past restricted zones with no amenities, and whispered: “Is this excellence—or just a real estate scam with a syllabus?”

🎬 एपिसोड 3: उत्कृष्टता की लीज़

⚠️ अस्वीकरण: यह एक काल्पनिक व्यंग्य है। इसका किसी जीवित या मृत व्यक्ति, स्थान या संस्था से कोई वास्तविक संबंध नहीं है। यह पूरी तरह से कल्पना है।

इमोजी और व्हाट्सएप शासन के बाद, लोटस विश्वविद्यालय के कुलपति ने एक नया क्षेत्र खोजा: सुधार के नाम पर ज़मीन और लूट।

उन्होंने चहेतों के साथ मिलकर सेक्शन‑8 कंपनियाँ बनाईं, और योग्य शोधकर्ताओं को दरकिनार कर अपात्रों को धन बाँटा। एक संदिग्ध व्यक्ति को “इनोवेशन इनिशिएटिव” का CEO बना दिया गया, जो कुलपति की हाँ में हाँ मिलाने के लिए मोटी तनख्वाह लेता रहा।

फिर उन्होंने धूमधाम से घोषणा की: “उत्कृष्टता केंद्र।”
यह शब्द सुनकर छात्रों ने आधुनिक प्रयोगशालाएँ, वैश्विक मेंटर और नवाचार की कल्पना की। लेकिन असलियत में यह एक लीज़ घोटाला था — सुधार के नाम पर ज़मीन की बंदरबाँट।

छात्रावासों, पुस्तकालयों और प्रयोगशालाओं के लिए आरक्षित विश्वविद्यालय की ज़मीन निजी कंपनियों को चुपचाप सौंप दी गई। विदेशी विश्वविद्यालयों से MoU बिना सरकारी अनुमति के साइन किए गए। ये “वैश्विक सहयोग” केवल फोटो खिंचवाने और प्रेस विज्ञप्तियों तक सीमित थे।

कुलपति इन MoU के बहाने विदेश यात्राएँ करते रहे — छात्रों के पैसों पर।
वहीं विश्वविद्यालय में:
- कैंटीन सालों से बंद पड़ी थी।
- विभागों में पीने का पानी नहीं था।
- छात्र सुविधाएँ खंडहर बन चुकी थीं।

कार्यरत प्रयोगशालाएँ तोड़ी गईं। कीमती उपकरण कूड़े में फेंक दिए गए। उनकी जगह बाहरी लोगों को दी गई।
उत्कृष्टता नहीं बनी — उसे आभार के सबसे ऊँचे बोलीदाता को बेचा गया।

प्रोफेसरों ने पूछा:
“शैक्षणिक जाँच कहाँ है?”
“ज़मीन हस्तांतरण की अनुमति किसने दी?”
“विश्वविद्यालय मकान मालिक क्यों बन गया है?”

कुलपति का जवाब था: प्रताड़ना।
एक वरिष्ठ प्रोफेसर के खिलाफ उन्होंने कई तथ्यान्वेषण समितियाँ गठित कीं — पहली रिपोर्ट दबा दी गई, और तब तक समितियाँ बनाते रहे जब तक मनमाफिक रिपोर्ट नहीं मिली।
उनका प्रशासन नीति नहीं था — व्हाट्सएप पर चलने वाला प्रतिशोध था।

जब ज़मीन बाँटी जा रही थी, कुलपति स्पष्ट रूप से कार्यालय से गायब थे।
उनकी कुर्सी एक संग्रहालय की वस्तु बन चुकी थी।
वे केवल मोबाइल से शासन करते थे:
- आदेश व्हाट्सएप पर आते।
- निर्णय इमोजी में होते।
- प्रशासन डिजिटल फरमानों से चलता।

जो भी उनके सचिवालय से जवाब माँगता, उसे घिसे‑पिटे बहाने मिलते:
“सर मीटिंग में हैं।”
“सर सहयोग के लिए यात्रा पर हैं।”

असलियत में सर गायब थे — शारीरिक रूप से अदृश्य, डिजिटल रूप से सर्वव्यापी, और संस्थागत रूप से गैरजिम्मेदार।

उनके पूर्ववर्ती ने विश्वविद्यालय को ईंट‑ईंट जोड़कर बनाया था।
वहीं ये कुलपति बुनियादी सुविधाओं की ओर पीठ किए बैठे थे:
- कैंटीन साल भर से बंद।
- विभागों में पानी नहीं।
- छात्र सुविधाएँ जर्जर।

इस रियल एस्टेट सर्कस को बौद्धिक चमक देने के लिए कुलपति ने विशेषज्ञ व्याख्यान शुरू किए।
लेकिन “विशेषज्ञ” ऐसे लोग थे जिनकी योग्यता संदिग्ध थी — लोटस विश्वविद्यालय के प्रोफेसरों से कहीं कम।

एक ने कभी कोई शोधपत्र नहीं लिखा।
दूसरा बुनियादी परीक्षाओं में फेल हो चुका था।
फिर भी उन्हें “द्रष्टा,” “विचार नेता,” और “वैश्विक परिवर्तनकारी” कहकर पेश किया गया।

सभी शिक्षकों के लिए उपस्थिति अनिवार्य घोषित की गई।
हॉल के दरवाज़े पर रजिस्टर रखे गए — जैसे स्कूल में हाज़िरी ली जाती है।

जो नहीं आए — चाहे कारण कितना भी जायज़ हो — उन्हें दंडित किया गया:
- एक प्रोफेसर जो विदेश में शोध प्रस्तुत कर रहे थे, उन्हें “अनुपालन न करने” पर फटकार मिली।
- एक अन्य, जो सर्जरी के बाद अस्पताल में थे, को “शैक्षणिक अनुशासनहीनता” का दोषी ठहराया गया।

कुलपति का फरमान स्पष्ट था:
“योग्यता नहीं, वफादारी मायने रखती है। उत्कृष्टता वही है जो मैं कहूँ।”

इधर चाटुकारों की तालियाँ तेज़ हो गईं:
“सर, यह क्रांतिकारी है।”
“सर, आप शिक्षा का पुनर्परिभाषण कर रहे हैं।”
“सर, आपको पद्म विभूषण मिलना चाहिए।”

एक ने तो नया भवन उनके नाम पर रखने का प्रस्ताव दे दिया:
“स्वप्रचार में उत्कृष्टता केंद्र।”

कुलपति मुस्कराए।
अपने पुराने गधे‑नौकरी वाले दिनों में उनके पास न अधिकार था, न सम्मान।
अब वे छात्रों के नाम पर लीज़ की गई ज़मीन पर राज कर रहे थे — स्वयं के नाम पर उसका सुख भोगते हुए।

जिस संस्था से वे पैराशूट से लोटस विश्वविद्यालय में उतरे थे, वहाँ के वरिष्ठ उन्हें एक मामूली कर्मचारी मानते थे — जिसने परिवार के रसूख से यह मलाईदार पद हथिया लिया।

छात्रों ने ऊँटी फीसें दीं, टूटी सुविधाओं के बीच चले, और फुसफुसाए:
“यह उत्कृष्टता है — या पाठ्यक्रम के साथ चल रहा रियल एस्टेट घोटाला?”

In a university born purely of imagination—where absurdity reigns and logic is outsourced—the solemn duty of academic ov...
25/02/2026

In a university born purely of imagination—where absurdity reigns and logic is outsourced—the solemn duty of academic oversight has been innovatively reassigned. This satire explores a fictional institution where security staff, not scholars, inspect classrooms, and surveillance replaces scholarship.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a purely imaginary satire. Any resemblance to persons living or dead, places or institutions is entirely coincidental and unintended.

Mock Circular: Academic Excellence Through Surveillance

Wor(l)d‑Class University
Office of the Vice Chancellor

Circular No. 2026/Surveillance/01

Subject: Delegation of Academic Oversight to Security Staff

In pursuit of our unwavering commitment to remain a “wor(l)d‑class” institution—where innovation often masquerades as abdication—it has been solemnly resolved that the responsibility of classroom oversight, traditionally vested in the Vice Chancellor, Dean Academic, or Heads of Departments, shall henceforth be executed by our Security Personnel.

This visionary reform ensures:

1. Pedagogical Policing: Security staff, equipped with state‑of‑the‑art body cams, shall enter classrooms to verify academic seriousness. Their footage will serve as the new benchmark of excellence, replacing outdated metrics like teaching quality or intellectual engagement.

2. Attendance Authentication: Students’ presence shall be validated not by professors, but by video evidence. A blink, a cough, or a sneeze shall suffice as proof of participation. Those who remain motionless may be marked “absent due to lack of biometric enthusiasm.”

3. Faculty Accountability: Professors are reminded that their teaching will be judged by the clarity of their voice on surveillance recordings. Any deviation from monotone delivery may be treated as misconduct. Passion, humor, or critical thinking may trigger disciplinary review.

4. VC’s Visionary Absence: The Vice Chancellor, in his infinite wisdom, recognizes that true leadership lies in strategic invisibility. His absence from classrooms—and indeed, from the university—is not negligence, but a bold act of decentralization.

This circular is issued in the spirit of transparency, efficiency, and the relentless pursuit of mediocrity disguised as merit.

By Order,
Vice Chancellor (Invisible, yet Omnipresent)

Address

Bawana Road
Delhi
110042

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Prof. Naveen Kumar posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The University

Send a message to Prof. Naveen Kumar:

Share