Labont: Center for Ontology

Labont:  Center for Ontology The Laboratory for Ontology is a research centre of the Department of Philosophy, University of Turin

The Laboratory for Ontology is a research centre of the Department of Philosophy, University of Torino directed by Maurizio Ferraris. The members of LabOnt are PhD Students and young Researchers in philosophy, with different specializations, ranging from Philosophy, philosophy of language, aesthetics, philosophy of the cognitive sciences, and history of philosophy, philosophy of art, ethics. Mauri

zio Ferraris founded the Laboratory in 1999, he organizes the activities of the Laboratory and the training of young researchers, and works directly to improve and develop the research line devoted to social ontology. Under his tutorship, many young researchers have developed their specific skills in cooperation and been able to achieve many important results – both in terms of publication, services to the professions and teaching. The general research field of LabOnt is ontology, namely the philosophical discipline that aims at providing a theory of what exists. Ontology, along with metaphysics at large, has lately returned to playing a central role in philosophy. This is probably because ontology has been attentive towards the empirical results of the “hard-sciences”, while not being servile towards them. On the contrary, a distinctive trait of contemporary researches in ontology is their explicit and critical approach to the study of the nature of the objects that constitute reality. The latter is understood as an objective background that constrains the lives of human beings, but also yields opportunities to them (such as society, economy, politics, art). Within this domain of problems and research questions, one of the main targets is the philosophical elaboration of theories that can enlarge and enrich, when necessary, the description of reality given by the natural sciences – physics,
biology, but also cognitive psychology.

Sacco, G. (2026). The Paradox of Fiction as Paradox of (Theories of) EmotionsSynthese, 207, 255.Abstract. The term “para...
11/07/2026

Sacco, G. (2026). The Paradox of Fiction as Paradox of (Theories of) Emotions
Synthese, 207, 255.

Abstract. The term “paradox of fiction” refers to the puzzle whereby, when we watch a film or read a book, we feel emotions toward fictional events, despite knowing that the characters involved do not exist. This issue has been at the center of debates in analytic philosophy of art. However, it has not been adequately addressed by philosophers of emotion. In this article, I use the paradox of fiction as a stress test to evaluate the three major theories of emotion, assessing how each can account for two ordinary intuitions concerning emotions toward fiction: (1) that they are not irrational per se, and (2) that they are not substantially different from the emotions we have in ordinary life. I examine how the three most influential accounts—the feeling theory, the cognitive-evaluative theory, and the motivational theory—can respond to the challenge posed by the paradox of fiction, arguing that, contrary to a widespread scholarly assumption, the cognitive theory stands the best chance of satisfying both desiderata. Moreover, I show that the motivational theory faces
greater difficulties in dealing with the paradox of fiction.

Keywords: paradox of fiction; emotions; cognitive theory; motivational theory; feeling theory.

CFP. Renovating humanity. Facing inhumanity in public and social lifeSan Raffaele School of Philosophy 2026Conference da...
10/07/2026

CFP. Renovating humanity. Facing inhumanity in public and social life
San Raffaele School of Philosophy 2026
Conference dates: December 14th – 16th, 2026
Deadline for submission: August 30th, 2026.
Accepted papers will be considered for publication in a special issue of Phenomenology and Mind.

Confirmed Invited Speakers
Mounira Al Solh (visual artist, Kunsthochschule Kassel)
Robin Celikates (Freie Universität Berlin)
Roberta De Monticelli (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan)
Jérôme Dokic (EHESS and Institut Jean-Nicod, Paris)
Julia Jansen (KU Leuven)
Dima Mohammed (Universidade Nova de Lisboa)

Guest Editors: Vittorio Catalano (University of Vienna); Simone Santamato (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)

In a multi-crisis and rapidly changing world such as the one we are currently living in, our own humanity faces crucial challenges. Conflicts and wars, as well as social and political contexts in which propaganda, manipulation and conformism, violence, hate speech, and abuse of power overflow, make philosophical reflection on what remains of humanity and how to promote its flourishing all the more compelling.

In this School, we aim to explore this issue from a variety of philosophical perspectives, combining a theoretical approach with more practical and applied ones.

Section 1. From a phenomenological point of view, we seek to explore how humanity can be preserved and renovated in one’s personal and social stance-takings, including acts of empathy and feeling together, shared emotions, value feeling, as well as collective acts of resistance. At the same time, we aim to investigate how phenomena in which one’s possibilities of personal stance-taking fail (e.g., forms of social conformity, repression, and reification of human persons) negatively impact personal flourishing, interpersonal relationships, and ultimately the core aspects of our own humanity.

Section 2. This section focuses on the role of discursive strategies and argumentative practices in shaping epistemic injustice in contexts involving marginalized communities. Public discourse plays a central role in distributing credibility, structuring whose voices are heard, and determining how disagreement is managed under conditions of inequality. Discursive and argumentative practices can both reinforce epistemic marginalization—through silencing, distortion, or dismissal—and enable forms of resistance that restore voice and recognition.

We invite contributions that examine how power asymmetries affect the uptake of both speech acts and arguments, how marginalized speakers navigate public disagreement, and which discursive strategies - such as protest or counterspeech - can effectively challenge discursive and epistemic injustice in contemporary communication environments.

Section 3. explores contemporary forms of collective resistance as practices through which individuals and groups claim and defend their humanity in contexts of oppression, injustice, and structural violence. Framing resistance as a morally significant practice, this section starts from the question of civil disobedience: can the deliberate and public breach of unjust norms constitute not only a politically legitimate act, but also a gesture of restoring dignity – one's own and that of others? Building on this, we examine the relationship between resistance and democracy, considering radical critique of structures of domination – political, legal, migratory – as a condition for democratic renewal. Solidarity and collective action appear here not merely as political strategies, but as ethical practices that mutually reactivate one's humanity, generate obligations toward others, and reconfigure the boundaries of moral communities.

Section 4. From the perspective of philosophy of perception, we aim to investigate how perceptual experience contributes to our recognition of others as persons and to the apprehension of morally and socially salient aspects of reality. Can emotions, intentions, vulnerability, dignity be directly perceived in our encounters with others, or are they merely inferred from perceptual cues? Addressing debates on social and moral perception, this section seeks to explore how perceptual experience may ground forms of responsiveness, empathy, and acknowledgment of others in public and social life. At the same time, we aim to examine how perceptual processes may be shaped or distorted by social norms, stereotypes, and ideological frameworks, thereby affecting what becomes salient in experience and potentially contributing to forms of objectification, dehumanization, or indifference toward suffering.

Section 5. explores the role of contemporary artistic practices in critically interrogating the conditions of our present and reimagining what it means to remain human in times of crisis. Rather than approaching art as a static object of historical inquiry, we invite contributions that engage with artistic practices as living, relational, and socially embedded forms of thought. We envision contemporary art as a site where ethical and political questions converge, traversing media, geographies, narratives, and experiences of displacement through reflexivity and imaginative speculation. Particular attention may be given to perspectives attuned to a feminist ethics of care, especially to Joan C. Tronto’s notion of “caring with” as the foundation of truly democratic societies grounded in reciprocity, interdependence, and accountability toward both human and more-than-human worlds. In a present marked by intertwined crises – wars, geopolitical instability, forced displacement, and climate emergency – this section seeks to foreground the emancipatory and generative potential of artistic practices to cultivate new forms of coexistence and shared imaginaries.

Enclosed are some prompts for contributions to the call for papers, differentiated by sections.

Section 1: Phenomenology

1) How can we face inhumanity and renovate our humanity? Can our personal and social stance-takings preserve and renovate humanity?

2) Does empathy have a role in recognizing and affirming others’ humanity? What are the potential costs of a neutralization of empathy?

3) Can phenomena such as feeling together and sharing emotions promote our experience of others as human beings like us? Are there any possible shortcomings in these experiences?

4) How do forms of hate, resentment, violence, and repression impact one’s flourishing and possibilities of personal stance-takings and personal modes of living together?

5) How may social conformity, affective contagion, and identification with leaders, as well as forms of impersonal collectives such as masses, involve the reification of human persons, the deconstruction of their agency, and the obliteration of the value of their dignity?

Section 2: Philosophy of language

1) How do linguistic strategies contribute to discursive injustice affecting marginalized communities?

2) How do public arguments contribute to epistemic injustice affecting marginalized communities?

3) How do power asymmetries shape whose arguments are taken seriously?

4) How is disagreement managed in contexts of epistemic marginalization?

5) What forms of discursive and argumentative resistance can counter epistemic injustice?

Section 3: Moral and Political Philosophy

1) Under what conditions do civil disobedience and nonviolent resistance constitute legitimate – and humanizing – responses to injustice?

2) How do structures of domination (political, legal, migratory) shape the possibilities of resistance and the forms of collective solidarity, and what ethical constraints – if any – govern them?

3) What is the relationship between radical critique of institutions and democratic renewal?

4) How can the transition from resistance to the construction of new forms of shared political life be articulated, and what moral principles – if any – should guide it?

Section 4: Philosophy of Perception

1) Can morally or socially significant features of reality—such as vulnerability, injustice, or dignity—be directly perceived, or are they always inferred from perceptual experience?

2) To what extent does perceptual experience contribute to our recognition of others as persons rather than objects, and what role does perception play in shaping empathy and responsiveness in social life?

3) How may perceptual experience be shaped or influenced by social norms, stereotypes, and ideological frameworks, and what are the implications of such influences for the perception of others?

4) What role do attention, salience, and perceptual framing play in determining which aspects of social and political reality become visible—or remain unnoticed—in public life?

5) How can philosophical reflection on perception help us understand and resist forms of dehumanization, objectification, or indifference toward suffering?

Section 5: Philosophy and History of Art

1) How can contemporary artistic practices contribute to questioning and reconfiguring our understanding of humanity in conditions of social, political, and ecological crisis?

2) In what ways can art be understood as a relational and socially embedded practice that engages with forms of interdependence, care, and responsibility?

3) How do feminist ethics and micro-historical approaches in art challenge dominant narratives and reshape our understanding of collective memory and identity?

4) How can artistic practices function as forms of resistance and repair in contexts of violence, displacement, and environmental disruption?

5) How might the concept of “caring with” inform the interpretation of contemporary art as a site of ethical and political engagement, and what implications does this have for rethinking more just societies and forms of coexistence?

Submissions must be prepared for double-blind review. Manuscripts – in .doc format – should not contain any identifying information and they cannot exceed 4000 words (references included). Manuscripts must be written in English. Moreover, they must contain:

- An abstract of no more than 150 words;
- 4/5 keywords;
- an indication of the section to which the submission is intended.

For stylistic details, see:
https://www.rosenbergesellier.it/eng/journals/phenomenology-and-mind/editorial-norms

Submissions should be sent via the Phenomenology and Mind website by August 30th, 2026.

Authors should register here and then log in to submit their papers. Please make sure to submit your paper to the section “Renovating humanity”.

For further information, please contact Vittorio Catalano ([email protected]) and Simone Santamato ([email protected]).

Important dates

Deadline for submissions: August 30th, 2026.
Notification of acceptance: October 20th, 2026.
San Raffaele School of Philosophy: December 14th – 16th, 2026.
Publication of the special issue (expected): July 2027.

Scientific Direction: Francesca De Vecchi, Francesca Forlè

Scientific Committee: Claudia Bianchi, Vittorio Catalano, Bianca Cepollaro, Greta Favara, Mara Floris, Francesca Pola, Elisabetta Sacchi, Roberta Sala, Simone Santamato, Sarah Songhorian.

Realism and the WebNaples, 10-11 JulyIstituto Italiano di Studi Filosofici"In June 2011, in Naples, at the Istituto Ital...
09/07/2026

Realism and the Web
Naples, 10-11 July
Istituto Italiano di Studi Filosofici

"In June 2011, in Naples, at the Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, I met a young German colleague, Markus Gabriel, who was planning an international conference on the fundamental character of contemporary philosophy. Markus asked me what, in my opinion, would be an appropriate title for the conference, and I replied: New Realism.” Maurizio Ferraris, Manifesto of New Realism (2012)

Fifteen years later, hope has become reality. New Realism has given rise to one of the most influential philosophical debates of the 21st century. Today, its protagonists, together with a new generation of philosophers, return to the scene of the crime in Naples to discuss one of its most ambitious legacies: Webfare, the project of a digital welfare state.

Day 1

9.00 – Institutional Greetings
9.20-10.00 – Jocelyn Benoist (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
10.00-10.40 – Carola Barbero (University of Turin)

10.40-11.10 – Coffee Break

11.10-11.50 – Maurizio Ferraris (University of Turin)
11.50-12.30 – André Charrak (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
12.30-13-10 – Niki Young (University of Malta)

Lunch

14.10-15.00 – Markus Gabriel (Bonn University)
15.00-15.40 – Ana Ilievska (American University of Beirut, Mediterraneo)
15.40-16.20 – Garance Benoit (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

16.20-16.50 – Coffee break

16.50-17.30 – Jens Rometsch (Bonn University)
17.30-18.10 – Pauldin Lawrence (Polytechnic University of Turin)

Day 2

9.00-9.40 – Charles Bodon (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
9.40-10.20 – Giulio Sacco (Polytechnic University of Turin)

10.20-10.50 – Coffee break

10.50-11.30 – Jan Voosholz (Bonn University)
11.30-12.10 – Jimmy Hernandez Marcelo (University of Salamanca)

12.10-13.10 – Roundtable: Jocelyn Benoist, Maurizio Ferraris, Markus Gabriel, Tania Cerquitelli, Ana Ilievska, Carola Barbero, Petar Bojanic, Kristupas Sabolius, Raffaella Scarpa, Rita Serpytyte, Niki Young, Jimmy Hernandez Marcelo.

Organizing Committee: Maurizio Ferraris, Tania Cerquitelli, Giulio Sacco, Pauldin Lawrence, Costanza Penna, Arturo Barina, Giulia Beltritti

Call for papers.  Azafea. Revista de Filosofía, vol. 30 (2028)Monograph: Jacques Derrida and the Phenomenological Tradit...
08/07/2026

Call for papers. Azafea. Revista de Filosofía, vol. 30 (2028)
Monograph: Jacques Derrida and the Phenomenological Tradition
Coordinators: Maurizio Ferraris (Università degli Studi di Torino) and Jimmy Hernández Marcelo (Universidad de Salamanca)
Submission deadline: May 28th, 2027

The relationship between Jacques Derrida and phenomenology constitutes one of the most fertile and widely debated issues in contemporary philosophy. For decades, the dominant interpretation held that deconstruction emerged as a break with Husserlian phenomenology and, more broadly, with the metaphysics of presence. From this perspective, Derrida's work was understood as exposing the limits of the phenomenological project while opening a radically new philosophical horizon.
Research conducted over the past decades has profoundly transformed this picture. The publication of manuscripts, seminars, and early writings, together with renewed interest in the genesis of Derrida's thought, has revealed the extent to which phenomenology constitutes the very ground upon which deconstruction develops. The study of Derrida's writings on Husserl between 1954 and 1967, along with the reconsideration of many of his later texts, has shown that some of the central problems of his philosophy—genesis, temporality, historicity, alterity, ideality, writing, and the constitution of meaning—emerge through a direct engagement with transcendental phenomenology.
This shift in perspective has led to a reassessment of both Derrida's philosophy and the history of French phenomenology itself. Rather than being described simply as a "post-phenomenological" thinker, Derrida increasingly appears as one of the most significant interlocutors within the tradition inaugurated by Husserl. Deconstruction can thus be understood not merely as a critique of phenomenology, but also as a radicalization of some of its fundamental tensions: between genesis and structure, presence and absence, ideality and historicity, constitution and alterity.
Moreover, Derrida's place within French phenomenology invites a reconsideration of the debates that shaped the reception of Husserl in France. His thought occupies a complex space of dialogue with figures such as Emmanuel Levinas, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jean Cavaillès, Suzanne Bachelard, Tran Duc Thao, and Paul Ricoeur, while engaging closely with some of the major philosophical questions of the twentieth century: the critique of metaphysics, theory of literature, philosophy of language, philosophy of history, epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy.
At a time when international scholarship increasingly emphasizes the continuity between phenomenology and deconstruction, it seems particularly important to foster renewed reflection on the philosophical significance of this dialogue. This special issue seeks to contribute to that endeavor by bringing together studies that explore, from both historical and systematic perspectives, the complex relationship between Derrida and phenomenology, as well as the enduring relevance of the questions arising from this encounter.
Suggested Topics:
Derrida as a reader of Husserl: interpretations, appropriations, and transformations.
The problem of genesis in Husserl and Derrida.
Phenomenology and deconstruction: continuity, transformation, or rupture.
Temporality, historicity, and the constitution of meaning.
Writing, inscription, and ideality.
Presence, absence, and metaphysics.
Alterity, intersubjectivity, and the experience of the other.
Derrida, Sartre, Levinas, Tran Duc Thao, Merleau-Ponty, Ricoeur, and the phenomenological legacy.
Derrida and the French epistemological tradition: Koyré, Cavaillès, Bachelard, Canguilhem, and Foucault.
Phenomenology, language, and the theory of signs.
Teleology, theology, and phenomenology.
Phenomenology, animality, and embodiment.
Derrida and the phenomenological interpretation of Heidegger.
Derrida's unpublished lectures and manuscripts.

Submission deadline: May 28th, 2027
All manuscripts received must comply with Azafea author guidelines (https://revistas.usal.es/dos/index.php/0213-3563/about/submissions) and will be evaluated using a double-blind peer review process. Submissions are accepted in Spanish, English, French, Italian and Portuguese.

TURIN Meets ECNU 2nd Edition. Sustainability, Webfare, and the Digital Age: A European-Chinese DialogueTurin, July 8th-9...
07/07/2026

TURIN Meets ECNU 2nd Edition. Sustainability, Webfare, and the Digital Age: A European-Chinese Dialogue
Turin, July 8th-9th
Scienza Nuova Institute, University of Turin, Corso Rodolfo Montevecchio 38

Program
DAY 1 – July 8th
h. 9.00: Registration and Welcome Coffee
h. 9.15: Tiziana Andina (University of Turin), Institutional Greetings and Introduction

Session I: Sustainability, Society, and Global Transformation
h. 9.30: Jing Wu (East China Normal University), The Achilles’ Heel of Digital Accelerationism
h. 10.30: Coffee break
h. 11.00: Egidio Dansero (University of Turin), Urban Food Policies and Sustainability, Between Global Networks and Reterritorialisation Process

Session II: Artificial Intelligence, Data, and Sustainable Futures
h. 12.00: Maurizio Ferraris (University of Turin), Webfare from China to Europe
h. 13.00: Lunch break
h. 14.00: Daniele Apiletti (Polytechnic University of Turin), MURENA: a MUlti-Agent LLM Pipeline for WEBFARE-Enabled Large-Scale Real Estate MaNAgement
h. 15.00: Pauldin Lawrence (Polytechnic University of Turin), An Introduction to Documedial Cooperativism
h. 16.00: Coffee break

Session III. Public Sphere, Communication, and Social Sustainability
h. 16.30: Giulio Sacco (Polytechnic University of Turin), Extended Mind, AI, and Education: How Sustainable Is the Use of AI?
h. 17.30: Erica Onnis (Cusano University), Two Narratives, One Crisis: Freedom, Prosperity, and the Challenge of Sustainable Diets

DAY 2 — July 9th
Session IV: Future, Responsibility, and Forms of Coexistence
h. 9.30: Tiziana Andina (University of Turin), Can a Community Outlive Its Members? Transgenerationality and the Temporal Structure of Community
h. 10.30: Cheng Hong (East China Normal University)
Confucian Civic Education for a Shared Future: Responsibility and Coexistence in a Harmonious Planetary Order
h. 11.30: Coffee break
h. 12.00: Costanza Penna (University of Turin), Sustainability Across Generations: The Role of Generative Communities
h. 13.00: Lunch break

Session V. Technology, Culture, and Forms of Life
h. 14.00: Kaihua Lu (East China Normal University), The Odyssey Year: An Impending Sustainability Challenge
h. 15.00: Diego Bubbio (University of Turin), Sustaining Forms of Life: Recognition, Social Reality, and Responsibility in the Digital Age
h. 16.00: Coffee Break
h. 16.30: Antonio Lucci (University of Turin), Toward an Organological Ethics: Critical Perspectives on Digital Humanism

Il tema. Libi senza turbamentiFarenheit, 30 giugnoLibri senza turbamenti. Con Fabio Stassi, bibliotecario, scrittore, gr...
06/07/2026

Il tema. Libi senza turbamenti
Farenheit, 30 giugno

Libri senza turbamenti. Con Fabio Stassi, bibliotecario, scrittore, grande esperto di biblioterapia e con Carola Barbero, scrittrice e docente di Filosofia del Linguaggio e Filosofia della Letteratura all'università di Torino.

Ascolta l'intervento: https://drive.google.com/file/d/144RcnHor3bjoWkegQhTb8dergySP-0uT/view

Angela Condello, Tiziano Toracca, Understanding law and literature through Freud's compromise formationActa Academica 20...
05/07/2026

Angela Condello, Tiziano Toracca, Understanding law and literature through Freud's compromise formation
Acta Academica 2026 58(1): 5-20

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/dez7m387
Keywords: law and literature, psychoanalysis, compromise formation, unconscious, jurisdiction, justice

Abstract. This article develops a theoretical framework that reconsiders the intersection between law and literature through the psychoanalytic notion of "compromise formation". We propose that both law and literature function as arts of compromise, mediating conflicts that are not only social or institutional, but also psychic and structural. Drawing on literary theory (notably Francesco Orlando’s reinterpretation of Freudian categories) and legal philosophy, the paper argues that both disciplines address ambivalence and contradiction, albeit differently: literature preserves and stages contradiction through figurality, while law resolves conflict through argumentation and decision-making. Three levels of compromise in law are outlined: foundational (the "contractual" basis of civilisation), ontological (legal object construction), and argumentative (interpretation and adjudication). We believe that using the literary model of compromise formation in legal reasoning and argumentation could offer new insights into how the law might handle deep moral and interpretive disagreements—particularly in areas like bioethics or civil rights—without necessarily suppressing contradiction. In doing so, the paper invites a paradigm shift in how we conceive of justice, interpretation, and legitimacy within the legal order.

Colloquio con Carola Barbero. Bisogna nuotare per essere feliciGiulia Masoero Regis, La Repubblica - S Salute, 25 giugno...
04/07/2026

Colloquio con Carola Barbero. Bisogna nuotare per essere felici
Giulia Masoero Regis, La Repubblica - S Salute, 25 giugno

In acqua si accede a una dimensione parallela e ci si può concentrare sui propri pensieri. A sedurre è la sua dimensione emotiva e psicologica. Il nuoto attiva oltre 200 muscoli ed è un toccasana per l'organismo. Ma non è solo uno sport. Una filosofa nuotatrice spiega questa cascata di effetti che coinvolgono l'intera esistenza.

Ci sono quelli che nuotano per tenersi in forma, perché sono obbligati, perché sono al mare, perché fa caldo o semplicemente perché lo hanno sempre fatto. Poi ci sono quelli che nuotano per amore, perché sono arrabbiati, perché non ne possono più o perché solo così riescono a essere felici». L'arte di nuotare, edito da Il Mulino, è l'ultima dichiarazione d'amore della professoressa di filosofia - ma soprattutto appassionata nuotatrice - Carola Barbero. Si stima che il nuoto attivi nel corpo umano oltre 200 muscoli, dalle braccia al bacino e poi ancora più giù, fino alle gambe. Ma, lungi dall'essere uno sport solo fisico, è la dimensione emotiva quella che seduce maggiormente le persone. Perché una bracciata dopo l'altra, il mondo si mette da parte e ci si concentra solo sui propri

Continua a leggere:https://mcusercontent.com/dc14b23b5f534994506b51948/files/bdf64f6b-49a3-8d42-1be7-10a1c4111e2d/Rep.Salute.Barbero.pdf

Festival della Filosofia. Intelligenza artificiale: rischi, opportunità, conoscenza, creativitàVeroli, 1-15 luglio Alla ...
03/07/2026

Festival della Filosofia. Intelligenza artificiale: rischi, opportunità, conoscenza, creatività
Veroli, 1-15 luglio
Alla sua VII edizione, il Festival della Filosofia di Veroli sceglie di confrontarsi con una delle questioni più rilevanti del nostro tempo: l’Intelligenza Artificiale. Un tema che attraversa il lavoro, l’informazione, la creatività, le relazioni e il modo stesso in cui produciamo e condividiamo conoscenza.
Dal 1° al 15 luglio, studiosi, giornalisti, filosofi e protagonisti del dibattito pubblico saranno a Veroli per approfondire le trasformazioni generate dall’IA, mettendo a confronto prospettive diverse e offrendo strumenti utili a comprendere una realtà in continua evoluzione. Un percorso che conferma la vocazione del Festival: portare nel cuore della Città le grandi questioni del presente e trasformarle in occasioni di confronto aperto e partecipato.

Fra i relatori
4 luglio, Chiostro di Sant’Agostino, h. 21.15
Maurizio Ferraris, Presentazione del libro, Comunismo digitale

Indirizzo

Turin

Notifiche

Lasciando la tua email puoi essere il primo a sapere quando Labont: Center for Ontology pubblica notizie e promozioni. Il tuo indirizzo email non verrà utilizzato per nessun altro scopo e potrai annullare l'iscrizione in qualsiasi momento.

Scelte rapide

Condividi