03/03/2026
๐
๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฐ-๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ
โข ๐จ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ผ ๐ง๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐, ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐น๐ฎ | ๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐ฎ๐ณ, ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ โข
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฝ ๐. ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐๐ฝ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ผ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป is widely recognized as the worldโs largest and most prestigious public international law advocacy tournament โ a yearly simulation of a dispute between countries before the ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ, the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
With the sheer discipline it demands, the release of the ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ช๐ด, which is the hypothetical problem that frames the legal dispute, commences each team's months-long cycle of research, writing, revision, and refinement. From September through early January, teams painstakingly draft two memorials โ one for the Applicant and one for the Respondent โ each of which must be grounded in authoritative international law sources and persuasive legal reasoning.
Once memorials are submitted, the work evolves. Dedicated practice sessions transition into mock oral hearings, where competitors simulate courtroom proceedings and refine their delivery, timing, and strategic responses. Only after this intense period of preparation do teams in their respective jurisdictions gather again for the oral rounds, where they will argue both sides of the case before panels of judges that test their legal knowledge, clarity, presence, and persuasive advocacy.
This yearโs Jessup Problem, ๐๐๐ ๐พ๐๐จ๐ ๐พ๐ค๐ฃ๐๐๐ง๐ฃ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ ๐๐ค๐ง๐๐, pushed participants to grapple with nuanced questions in public international law โ from the right of third-State intervention in contentious proceedings to the protection of indigenous peoplesโ rights and the limits of sovereign immunity in our rapidly globalizing world.
Against this backdrop of exceptional challenge, the ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ฐ ๐๐ญ ๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ Jessup Team demonstrated extraordinary commitment and resilience:
๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ก ๐. ๐๐รฑ๐๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ &
๐๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ณ๐ฆ๐ ๐. ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐
| แดษขแดษดแด๊ฑ ๊ฐแดส แดสแด แดแดแดสษชแดแดษดแด
๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ง ๐. ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ซ. &
๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ ๐
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐. ๐๐๐ข๐จ๐ง๐
| แดษขแดษดแด๊ฑ ๊ฐแดส แดสแด สแด๊ฑแดแดษดแด
แดษดแด
๐๐ซ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ง๐ ๐. ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ก๐
| แด๊ฐ แดแดแดษด๊ฑแดส
Their experience manifests their individual skill and sustained intellectual labor โ from the long nights drafting memorials to the nerve-tested hours in the oral rounds.
The MSU Law-Iligan Team profoundly thanks our Chancellor Alizedney M. Ditucalan, whose belief in this team did more than authorize a journey to Manila but reminded us that: from Iligan, our voices are worthy of the worldโs most exacting legal conversations.
To DMS thanks our Coaches & Advisers Atty. Annabelle B. Caรฑazares-Mindalano and Atty. Janodin Marohombsar, who saw the arguments before they were polished as well as doubts, but remained our enlightening guides, patient and exacting until we could meet the bench with the steadiness of our own.
Thank you to the DMS members, Ansarey T. Fernando, Anas M. Malaco Jr., Nabel D. Mascara, Kince Alhansah M. Panondiongan, and Najib D. Macausor, whose work lived in footnotes, drills, and delight that carried us through the loudest moments of this cerebral venture.
To our sponsors, your generosity transcended more than material support, but a tangible vote of confidence that allowed us to focus on the law, knowing that a community stood behind us.
To everyone who followed the Jessup journey, cheered them on, and saw the countless hours of preparation that went into these competitions: thank you.
!