Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society

Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society Informações para nos contactar, mapa e direções, formulário para nos contactar, horário de funcionamento, serviços, classificações, fotos, vídeos e anúncios de Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society, Ensino superior, CEPS meeting room. ELACH Building/University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga.

📣 New publications by CEPS researcher Nunzio Alì!Two new articles by CEPS researcher Nunzio Alì, including one co-author...
20/07/2026

📣 New publications by CEPS researcher Nunzio Alì!
Two new articles by CEPS researcher Nunzio Alì, including one co-authored publication, have recently been published.

📖 Piroli, D., & Alì, N. (2025). Climate Change and Future Generations: Fairness, Political Catastrophe, and the Preservation of Just and Stable Institutions Over Time. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Politica, (9), 63–87.
👉https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-3267

📖 Alì, N. (2025). Emission Reductions Without Addressing Economic Inequality? Proportional Justice as a Path to a Fair Green Transition. Philosophy and Public Issues, 2, 333–352.
👉https://doi.org/10.17473/2240-7987-2025-2-10

📣 New publication co-authored by CEPS researcher Manuel Sá Valente!📖 Meijers, Tim, and Manuel Sá Valente. “No Time for L...
16/07/2026

📣 New publication co-authored by CEPS researcher Manuel Sá Valente!
📖 Meijers, Tim, and Manuel Sá Valente. “No Time for Limitarianism? The Temporal Scope of Having Too Much.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 31, no. 4 (2026): 477–502.
👉https://www.jesp.org/paper/36646f73-90e0-8059-af62-edfce8b34804

📸 Some highlights from our 16th Braga Summer School: Workplace Democracy and The Future of Work! ☀️A huge thank you to e...
13/07/2026

📸 Some highlights from our 16th Braga Summer School: Workplace Democracy and The Future of Work! ☀️

A huge thank you to everyone who joined us!
We're especially grateful to our outstanding keynote speakers, Iñigo González-Ricoy and Nicholas Vrousalis, and to our wonderful lecturers, Catarina Neves and Hugo Rajão.👏

See you again next year! 🎉📚

✨ Last week was truly incredible! The 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Philosophy was a great success, and we...
06/07/2026

✨ Last week was truly incredible! The 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Philosophy was a great success, and we couldn't be happier with how it turned out.
We are deeply grateful to our organizing committee, our dedicated student volunteers, and all the speakers whose contributions made this conference such a stimulating event👏.
A very special thank you goes to our outstanding keynote speakers: Sally Haslanger, Robin Celikates, and Chiara Cordelli 🌟 🌟 🌟

📸 Here are a few highlights from the conference. You can explore the full photo gallery here: https://www.sas.uminho.pt/galeria/1988

Thank you to everyone who contributed to making this edition such a success. We look forward to welcoming you again next year!

Escola de Letras, Artes e Ciências Humanas

🎙️ Our own Jorge D. M. Mateus was recently interviewed by UMinho I&D (RUM – University of Minho Radio), where he explore...
26/06/2026

🎙️ Our own Jorge D. M. Mateus was recently interviewed by UMinho I&D (RUM – University of Minho Radio), where he explored the ethical challenges of transhumanism and the risks posed by brain–computer interfaces in the age of Artificial Intelligence.

“The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence and neurotechnologies raises questions that, until recently, belonged to the realm of science fiction. Philosophical reflection has never been more important than it is today, in a world where our relationship with machines is becoming increasingly close.”

📻 Listen to the full interview here: https://www.rum.pt/

🔬 𝗨𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗛𝗢 𝗜 & 𝗗

Neste episódio do UMinho I&D, mergulhamos no complexo e fascinante cruzamento entre a humanidade e a tecnologia. Jorge Mateus, investigador do Centro de Ética, Política e Sociedade da Escola de Letras, Artes e Ciências Humanas da UMinho, ajuda-nos a descodificar o Transumanismo. A conversa aborda a visão do nosso corpo biológico como uma limitação, os desafios das Interfaces Cérebro-Máquina e a urgência de colocar o ser humano no centro do debate sobre o avanço tecnológico.

Uma reflexão fundamental sobre os limites da nossa natureza para ouvir hoje, a partir das 20h00, na Universitária.

📻 Qui
⏰ 20h00
💻 rum.pt

🔥 Everything is ready for an amazing week in Braga! 🔥📅 June 29 – July 1🎓 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Phi...
25/06/2026

🔥 Everything is ready for an amazing week in Braga! 🔥

📅 June 29 – July 1
🎓 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Philosophy
Featuring:
✨ Sally Haslanger
✨ Robin Celikates
✨ Chiara Cordelli
Full program and abstracts at: https://16bragameetings.weebly.com/program-and-abstracts.html

📅 July 2 – 3
🏛️ 16th Braga Summer School in Political Philosophy and Public Policy
Workplace Democracy and the Future of Work

🎤 Keynote lectures by:
⭐ Iñigo González-Ricoy
⭐ Nicholas Vrousalis

📚 Featuring lectures by:
✨ Catarina Neves
✨ Hugo Rajão
Full program and abstracts at: https://16bragasummerschool.weebly.com/program-and-abstracts.html

We are looking forward to welcoming you all to Braga for an inspiring and busy week of discussions and exchange! 🚀

🎉 We are delighted to share the final program for the 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Philosophy!📚 This year...
16/06/2026

🎉 We are delighted to share the final program for the 16th Braga Meetings on Ethics and Political Philosophy!

📚 This year's event features three exceptional keynote lectures by:

✨ Sally Haslanger (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
✨ Robin Celikates (Freie Universität Berlin)
✨ Chiara Cordelli (University of Chicago)

We look forward to welcoming our speakers for three full days of engaging discussions and exchange of ideas!

🔗 Check the full program and book of abstracts at: https://16bragameetings.weebly.com/program-and-abstracts.html

📢 CEPS Seminar / Mitchell Berman (Penn Carey Law, University of Pennsylvania)"Retributivism in the philosophy of punishm...
02/06/2026

📢 CEPS Seminar / Mitchell Berman (Penn Carey Law, University of Pennsylvania)
"Retributivism in the philosophy of punishment"
📅 Tuesday, June 9
⌚️ 16.00 Lisbon time
📍 Online
https://zoom.us/j/95430963757?pwd=Xqy6SFSSl0c24ztaF02Bng8Szo7q8P.1

Abstract. In the Anglophone tradition, at least, there are two main proposed justifications for the infliction of state punishment: because the offender deserves it (retributivism), and because the infliction is expected to yield net good consequences (consequentialism), especially but not exclusively through the mechanisms of general and specific deterrence. I believe that many factors contribute to the justifiability of punishment. That makes me a pluralist about punishment’s justification. I also believe that an offender’s desert counts among the factors that contribute to the justifiability of punishment. That makes me a retributivist. I’m a pluralist retributivist. Or a retributivist pluralist. Although I lean retributivist, I’m not confident or complacent about it. Many or most contemporary philosophers who work in normative ethics or political philosophy believe that retributivism is barbaric and indefensible. And I’m not sure they’re wrong. In my remarks, I’ll identify what I believe are the greatest challenges facing retributivists and will sketch how I’m disposed to meet them in working out the view I call ‘prospect retributivism’. The seminar will be based on the chapter ‘Retribuitivism’ from the recently published The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Punishment (DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197750506.013.3) on punishment theory. Additional published articles and book chapters on retribuitivism by pfor. Berman are available here: https://www.law.upenn.edu/faculty/mitchber

Bio. Mitchell Berman, Leon Meltzer Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the Institute of Law and Philosophy at the Penn Carey Law, university of Pennsylvania, writes and teaches in American constitutional law and theory, philosophy of criminal law, general jurisprudence, and philosophy of sport. His contributions to these diverse fields include a novel nonoriginalist theory of American constitutional interpretation, a new positivist account of legal content, and an original retributivist justification for criminal punishment. He also claims to have solved the paradox of blackmail, the mystery of unconstitutional conditions, and the age-old puzzle of whether referees should “swallow the whistle” in crunch time. Berman’s many articles and book chapters on these and other topics have appeared, or are forthcoming, in the leading peer-reviewed journals in his fields, including Ethics, Noûs, Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, Legal Theory, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Law & Philosophy, Criminal Law & Philosophy, and Journal of Philosophy of Sport; in prominent student-edited law reviews including University of Pennsylvania Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, Michigan Law Review, California Law Review, Texas Law Review, Notre Dame Law Review, Virginia Law Review, NYU Law Review, Duke Law Journal, and Georgetown Law Journal; and in edited volumes published by Oxford, Cambridge, and Routledge.

📢 CEPS Seminar / Victor Tadros (University of Warwick)"Democracy by Agreement"📅 Thursday, May 28⌚️ 15:00 Lisbon time📍 On...
19/05/2026

📢 CEPS Seminar / Victor Tadros (University of Warwick)
"Democracy by Agreement"
📅 Thursday, May 28
⌚️ 15:00 Lisbon time
📍 Online
https://zoom.us/j/95430963757?pwd=Xqy6SFSSl0c24ztaF02Bng8Szo7q8P.1

Abstract:
In this paper I defend a view of democracy based on consent and affirmation. Democracy is valuable when, and because, it secures the consent and affirmation of people for just government – both for the implementation of just substantive policies, and for the government who implement them. Those seeking to govern are required to seek, and preferably secure agreement. Democratic justice occurs when they achieve this through democratic elections, as long as the government is substantively just. Because consent and affirmation are morally important without making a difference to substantive justice, democracy can make a society more just. However, because consent and affirmation make substantively unjust policies worse, democratic injustice is worse than democratic justice. Nevertheless, I argue that democracy based on consent can sometimes justify suboptimal government.

Bio:
Victor Tadros is Professor of Criminal Law and Legal Theory at the University of Warwick. He was educated at Oxford University (BA Hons) and at King’s College, London (PhD). Prior to joining Warwick in 2006, he held lectureships at the University of Aberdeen and the University of Edinburgh, and in the fall of 2015 he was Carter Visiting Professor of General Jurisprudence at Harvard Law School. From 2010-13 he held an AHRC Research Grant, with Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Massimo Renzo, to work on criminalization. He held a Leverhulme Major Research Fellowship from 2014-2018, and was elected as Fellow of the British Academy in 2018. Victor has written extensively on the philosophy of criminal law, just war theory, and on a range of issues in moral, legal and political philosophy. He is the author of Criminal Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2005), The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011), Wrongs and Crimes (Oxford University Press, 2016), To Do, To Die, To Reason Why (Oxford University Press, 2020), and Consent and the Sexual Revolution (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).

📢 CEPS Seminar / Elvio Baccarini (University of Rijeka)"What Can We Learn about Theories of Justice and Present-Day Popu...
18/05/2026

📢 CEPS Seminar / Elvio Baccarini (University of Rijeka)
"What Can We Learn about Theories of Justice and Present-Day Populism from Triumph of the Will?"
📅 Wednesday, May 27
⌚️ 11:00 Lisbon time
📍 In Person and Online
CEPS room and Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/95430963757?pwd=Xqy6SFSSl0c24ztaF02Bng8Szo7q8P.1

Abstract:
This talk examines present-day radical right-wing populism and its implications for theories of justice and democratic policymaking. It adopts a dynamic conception of justice, according to which theories and policies are continually revised through engagement with real social problems. Understanding contemporary right-wing populism is therefore important not only for effective political responses, but also for refining liberal egalitarian conceptions of justice themselves.
The talk argues that artworks can contribute to this understanding. In particular, Triumph of the Will reveals important emotional and psychological dynamics underlying mass support for authoritarian movements. While artistic analysis cannot replace empirical or historical research, the film helps illuminate aspects of early totalitarianism that remain relevant to contemporary right-wing populism.
A central claim is that many interpretations of right-wing populism are inadequate because they explain its appeal solely in terms of ignorance, irrationality, or moral deficiency. Such explanations fail to account for the scale of the phenomenon and often alienate its adherents. By contrast, Triumph of the Will shows how Na**sm appealed manipulatively to widely shared needs for safety, belonging, recognition, and empowerment. The film portrays Hi**er as a protective and approachable saviour, while scenes of collective work, celebration, and togetherness create an image of strength, unity, and social meaning.
Clearly, the film is not a reliable representation of reality, but rather a manipulative act of propaganda. Yet precisely because of this, it represents valuable evidence of one of the reasons Na**sm was massively attractive in its early stages and can serve as a valuable interpretive lens for understanding contemporary right-wing populisms. The film also suggests that adherence to authoritarian movements is not simply an “escape from freedom,” but often a search for empowerment and participation in something experienced as meaningful and energizing. Although this empowerment is manipulative and illusory, its emotional force helps explain the attraction of such movements, both historically and today.
The broader lesson is that democratic and egalitarian political movements cannot respond effectively to right-wing populism if they ignore the social and emotional needs that these movements exploit. A defensible conception of justice must therefore protect basic rights and liberties while also addressing needs for well-being, recognition, community, safety, and social belonging. These concerns are already present in the work of thinkers such as John Stuart Mill, John Rawls, and Martha Nussbaum, but they may require stronger emphasis today.

Bio:
Professor of Ethics and Political Philosophy at the University of Rijeka (Croatia). He has published books on public reason and biotechnologies, the political philosophy of J.S. Mill, moral epistemology, practical ethics and philosophy of literature. His articles have appeared in The Journal of Medical Ethics, Grazer Philosophische Studien, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Acta Analytica, and other academic journals. He has delivered guest lectures at the University of Oxford, Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Freie Universität Berlin, University of Iceland in Reykjavik, University of Amsterdam, University of Bologna, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, and several other institutions. He has taught as a guest professor at Ruhr University Bochum, the State University of Milan and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Milan. Additionally, he has been an Erasmus guest lecturer at the universities of Eastern Piedmont Vercelli, Hannover, Potsdam, Pavia, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, and Antwerp.

Endereço

CEPS Meeting Room. ELACH Building/University Of Minho, Campus De Gualtar
Braga
4710-057,BRAGA,

Notificações

Seja o primeiro a receber as novidades e deixe-nos enviar-lhe um email quando Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society publica notícias e promoções. O seu endereço de email não será utilizado para qualquer outro propósito, e pode cancelar a subscrição a qualquer momento.

Compartilhar

Categoria