M. A. on Capitol Hill-Catholic University Politics Dept.

M. A. on Capitol Hill-Catholic University Politics Dept. The Politics Dept at Catholic offers MA degrees with classes held on Capitol Hill. Contact Dr. Diana Rich @ 202-319-6224 or see http://capitolhill.cua.edu

We offer two exceptional off-campus programs leading to a Master of Arts degree in either International Affairs (MAIA), or in Congressional and Presidential Studies (CAPS). Each program is affordable and designed for working professionals as well as other graduate students. Our classes are held in the evening near Capitol Hill, Washington DC. For more information from a real person contact Dr. Diana Rich, Director, at 202-319-6224; or visit the web site: http://capitolhill.cua.edu

In case the Noonan article cannot be opened from the previous post, here is the text.  Every time I imagine Elizabeth Wa...
09/29/2019

In case the Noonan article cannot be opened from the previous post, here is the text.

Every time I imagine Elizabeth Warren debating Donald Trump, I picture him rumbling onto the stage like a big white bear—roaring “Grrr grrrr,” towering over her, paws flailing, claws extended. She’ll stand there looking up at him in the lights, and you’ll wonder if she’s trembling, cowering, because clearly she’s about to be crushed. And then she’ll take a brisk step forward and punch him hard and sharp in the kidney. And he’ll howl—“Aarrrrggg!”—because he’s surprised and it hurts and he assumed he’d easily chase her around the stage.

She’ll say, “Mr. President, I know everyone’s supposed to be afraid of you and your rough ways, but I don’t find you so tough. And I’m not afraid of you.” (Transcript: “Applause, cheers.”) Then she’ll call him soft, corrupt, incompetent—a phony martyr who doesn’t respect his own supporters enough to fake respectability.

He’ll call her a left-wing nut who’ll ruin the economy, destroy capitalism, kill our greatness, steal our private health insurance.

We’ll be off. And no one will know where it’s going.

That is my impeachment thought: Nobody knows where this is going. The politically obsessed may think they do, but something wild and unpredictable has been let loose. The charges are serious and credible. But America is as divided as it was in 2016, America is still in play, and it’s all up for grabs.

Everything, the entire outcome, will depend on public opinion.

The charge is that the American president went to the leader of Ukraine and invited him to take part in the 2020 presidential election by investigating one of the president’s likely competitors. Mr. Trump might have added pressure by delaying U.S. aid.

What is immediately striking is that no one who has spoken in defense of the president, including his spokesmen, has said these words: “Donald Trump would never do that!” Or, “That would be unlike him!” That will be the president’s problem as public opinion develops: everyone knows he would do it, everyone knows it is like him. There’s no mystique of goodness to be destroyed.

If everything depends on public opinion then a lot depends on how the House comports itself. Will the Democrats be sober, steady, fair-minded? Or will they be disorganized divas who play to their base and win over no one else? Are they capable of rising to the moment?

The guess here is that articles of impeachment will be drawn, presented and pass the House.

Impeachment is a grave constitutional and governmental act, but it is also a political one that requires public support. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has calculated that the case is strong and the people will come along. She wouldn’t have moved forward if she didn’t think she was going to win. The president is wrong when he says she’s finally bowed to the mad progressives of her party, who are so colorfully belligerent, who last summer pushed to impeach William Barr and last week wanted to impeach Brett Kavanaugh. Mrs. Pelosi is an attentive vote-counter and a practical pol. I think she’s moving now because she thinks she got him and the jig is up.

At an off-the-record meeting in New York Monday, the night before she announced the impeachment push, she looked like someone whose old hesitation was gone. In its place was the joy of the hunt.

As for the Senate, the understandable and previously reliable common wisdom was that Republicans there will keep the needed 67 votes for conviction from materializing. That’s probably still likely, but it’s no sure thing. Tuesday the Senate voted unanimously for the whistleblower’s complaint to be made public. (On Thursday it was.) Senators didn’t say, “This is just another partisan witch hunt. Grrr grrr.” Why not? Because the charges were serious and they couldn’t refuse to ask for more information. Because they wanted to signal to the White House that they couldn’t accept the idea that aid to Ukraine could have been held up over something like this. Because they had to assume more bad information was coming. And because they’re four years into the Trump era and are tired of having to excuse and explain everything the president does that is surprising, illogical, unprofessional, dubious.

Most of them wouldn’t miss him if he were gone. They’d happily peel off if public opinion back home seemed to shift.

Among Trump supporters right now, the Ukraine story would look like a Washington-centric phony drama—more partisan nonsense, business as usual, ignore it. But if the story gets bad, if it comes to be thought of as a real national-security question, as the whistleblower charged in his report, they will pay attention and care.

So much depends on who’s called to testify and what they say and how ugly a picture they paint.

Wholly anecdotal but perhaps significant, I heard this week from two separate Trump supporters, one in the past passionate, the other whose support was always softer, who shared their dismay at the Ukraine story. Both said these words: “Maybe Pence wouldn’t be so bad.” They were exhausted by the drama and wrongness. Why not the man with the soft white hair?

In the end, in purely practical political terms, the one person who will be hurt by this story will be Joe Biden. Every telling of this story necessitates pointing out that Mr. Biden’s son Hunter had cozy financial relationships with other countries, including Ukraine. It’s real swamp stuff. It looks bad, say the former vice president’s friends. No, it is bad.

It is infuriating that members of America’s leadership class so often show themselves to the world as self-enriching. As a nation we spent the 20th century presenting ourselves to the world as a truly moral leader, a self sacrificing country, one to be looked up to. In the 21st century our political figures and their families too often look like scrounging grifters—Americans with connections who can be hired, who leverage connections to fame for profit. There’s a fairly constant air of soft corruption, of an easy, seamy reality of big-power back scratching.

It makes America look bad. It makes us look weak and craven, like we can be bought.

There should be something called the Class Act. If you have any class, you don’t profit financially from a relative in power in the world’s greatest democracy. You don’t embarrass your country that way. Because, you know, you have class. You’re lucky to be from a respected family. A president or vice president might say, “It’s unfair to make my child sacrifice a deal because of what his father does!” Actually, no one asked you to ask for power; no one told you to want it. If you get it, it’s an honor. Do your job. Yes, your family should sacrifice, as should you.

The story of Hunter Biden and his business adventures isn’t new, and yet sometimes stories come alive in new ways. This one will probably come into focus for a while and be emblematic of the swamp.

Joe Biden probably thought it was old news, already dissected and dismissed. But it’s back, and will hit him like a kidney punch.

Peggy Noonan

Peggy Noonan is an opinion columnist at the Wall Street Journal where her column, Declarations, has run since 2000.

She was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 2017. A political analyst for NBC News, she is the author of nine books on American politics, history and culture, from her most recent, “The Time of Our Lives,” to her first, “What I Saw at the Revolution.” She is one of ten historians and writers who contributed essays on the American presidency for the book, “Character Above All.” Noonan was a special assistant and speechwriter for President Ronald Reagan. In 2010 she was given the Award for Media Excellence by the living recipients of the Congressional Medal of Honor; the following year she was chosen as Columnist of the Year by The Week. She has been a fellow at Harvard University’s Institute of Politics, and has taught in the history department at Yale University.

Before entering the Reagan White House, Noonan was a producer and writer at CBS News in New York, and an adjunct professor of Journalism at New York University. She was born in Brooklyn, New York and grew up there, in Massapequa Park, Long Island, and in Rutherford, New Jersey. She is a graduate of Fairleigh Dickinson University in Rutherford. She lives in New York City. In November, 2016 she was named one of the city's Literary Lions by the New York Public Library.

Peggy Noonan weighs in on the impeachment of Donald Trump and ramifications for the Democrats.
09/29/2019

Peggy Noonan weighs in on the impeachment of Donald Trump and ramifications for the Democrats.

Pelosi thinks she has Trump’s number. She may be right, though Biden won’t escape this scandal.

An excellent primer from the NYT on impeachment.  Note Federalist 65.
09/27/2019

An excellent primer from the NYT on impeachment. Note Federalist 65.

The inquiry into President Trump has the potential to reshape his presidency. Here’s how impeachment works.

And now a word from the Terminator!
09/09/2019

And now a word from the Terminator!

Ever since Ronald Reagan, each California governor has continued the legacy of moving toward a clean energy future.

What have we learned in the 8 years since the start of WW II??  According to this opinion piece, alas, not much
09/02/2019

What have we learned in the 8 years since the start of WW II?? According to this opinion piece, alas, not much

The spirit of certitude that dominated the politics of the 1930s is not so distant from us today.

CPOL Professor John White, an expert and scholar on presidential politics, wrote an op-ed for The Hill, published recent...
09/02/2019

CPOL Professor John White, an expert and scholar on presidential politics, wrote an op-ed for The Hill, published recently.

Looking ahead to 2020, one question is uppermost in the minds of Democrats: Who can beat Donald Trump?

CPOL professor James Wallner offers his thoughts on the Senate breaking Senate rules.
08/26/2019

CPOL professor James Wallner offers his thoughts on the Senate breaking Senate rules.

Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, has a word of warning for Democrats: Don’t scrap the filibuster.

Washington's own Phillips Gallery and its special refugee exhibition, "The Warmth of Other Suns" is highlighted in this ...
08/18/2019

Washington's own Phillips Gallery and its special refugee exhibition, "The Warmth of Other Suns" is highlighted in this NYT essay.

Without exiles and émigrés there is no modern culture. A new show in Washington maps a century of art and displacement.

This page is not a movie review - however, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is recommended along with Maureen Dowd's essay....
08/09/2019

This page is not a movie review - however, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is recommended along with Maureen Dowd's essay.

Would you rather be in a time machine with Brad Pitt or Donald Trump?

Dr. James Wallner, a CAPS professor in our program, authored this essay on the critical need for diversity in a free and...
07/29/2019

Dr. James Wallner, a CAPS professor in our program, authored this essay on the critical need for diversity in a free and equitable republic.

James Wallner on why real diversity is essential for politics, and how our current political culture undermines it.

Happy Fourth of July!!
07/04/2019

Happy Fourth of July!!

The men and women who fought in the American Revolution despised pageantry and personality cults.

What did Romeo say, "What's in a name...."
05/23/2019

What did Romeo say, "What's in a name...."

At rallies and in interviews, on Twitter and in formal speeches, he relishes the bad-boy language of a shock jock, just one more way of provoking the political establishment.

Address

620 Michigan Avenue NE
Washington D.C., DC
20064

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when M. A. on Capitol Hill-Catholic University Politics Dept. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The University

Send a message to M. A. on Capitol Hill-Catholic University Politics Dept.:

Share